Most ridiculous BP defense ever

Ultimately (BP) cannot be faulted because, I'm sorry, it was an accident that took place, and BP, I think, is paying a very, very heavy price indeed

This has to be the most ridiculous statement, made by press in the UK, that I've ever heard anyone make on behalf of BP. We all know countries to be seperate from corporations (altho which of the two control the other is up for debate) and so to blindly defend BP because pension funds ride on it is incredibly criminal at worst and self-serving at best.

Enron/Worldcom screwed up, tons of people's pension funds were wiped out. That is often the cost of criminal acts, incompetence or poor leadership. It may call for better fund management, better regulations or scrutiny of safety procedures. In BP's case they knowingly ignored safety concerns and no price can be too heavy when local fishermen, environment, ecosystems have been irreparably damaged.

Pay up.

England/US exchange witty emails on eve of cup match

From: Philip Breeden, US Embassy London

To: Martin Longden, British Embassy Washington DC

Subject: World Cup Bet

Mr. Longden, It has not escaped our attention that a certain sporting event is fast approaching, and that our respective nations will soon be meeting on the fields of South Africa.

My Ambassador has asked me to see if your Ambassador might be interested in a small wager? We will understand if you decline, given the outcome of the last such encounter.

Sincerely, Philip Breeden, U.S. Embassy, London

________________________________

From: Martin Longden, British Embassy Washington DC

To: Philip Breeden, US Embassy London

Subject: Re: World Cup Bet

Mr. Breeden,

Even for such an exceptionally optimistic nation as the United States, I am struck by the confidence with which your Ambassador proposes this wager. It is testament, I assume, to the generosity of your great nation - since the British Ambassador does not anticipate paying out.

Your email does not specify the exact terms of the wager. May I suggest that, in the event of an England victory, the US Ambassador agrees to entertain the British Ambassador at a steak-house of his choosing in downtown DC? And in the event that the United States is able to engineer a fortuitous win over England, then my man will entertain yours at a London pub of his choosing. Loser pays.

Your reference to a previous sporting encounter between our two countries puzzles me. Since the history of English football is long and extensive, in contradistinction to US soccer, I regret that I cannot immediately recall the encounter to which you refer. No doubt it is remembered fondly on these shores; we have quite forgotten it, however.

Are you sure you want to do this?

Yours sincerely, Martin Longden British Embassy Washington DC

________________________________

From: Philip Breeden, US Embassy London

To: Martin Longden, British Embassy Washington DC

Subject: Re: World Cup Bet

Mr. Longden ,

It is with great pleasure, and no small measure of anticipation, that the U.S. Ambassador accepts the terms of the wager. I am surprised, given the well known love of the British for history, that you have forgotten what happened the last time the “special relationship” was tested on the pitch. Of course, given the result, you are to be forgiven for having misplaced that particular episode in your memory banks. I refer of course to the victory of the U.S. over England in the 1950 World Cup.

It is true that our soccer (a fine English word we have kindly preserved for you) history is not as long and illustrious as yours. However, as your generals noted during WWII, we have a unique capability for quickly identifying and advancing talent.

Game on!

Sincerely, Philip Breeden

________________________________

From: Martin Longden, British Embassy Washington DC

To: Philip Breeden, US Embassy London

Subject: Re: World Cup Bet

Mr. Breeden,

Very well; it’s a bet!

Incidentally, you should know that the Ambassador takes his steak like American soccer victories - somewhat rare.

Sincerely,

Martin Longden

So if England wins, the U.S. Ambassador has to take the British Ambassador to a steakhouse "of his choosing" in downtown Washington, D.C., and if the U.S. wins, the British Ambassador has to take his American counterpart to a London pub. Loser, of course, pays.

Isn't it just so much fun when the most educated members of our nations engage in an attempt at hooligan banter? Look at all those finely formed sentences and sarcastic wit. You can almost feel the thinly repressed, wing-tipped rage.

Let the hype continue!

******

Reposted from http://g.sports.yahoo.com/soccer/world-cup/blog/dirty-tackle/post/England-and-U-S-ambassadors-make-wager-trade-w?urn=sow,246886#

Fascinating sets of emails from the UK and US Embassies to each other. Arguably some of the most finest and polished middle-finger gesturing I've seen. Game on!!